3. Performance

Distribution in age group, education, occupation, number of family members in a household, household generation type, marital status, physical activity, and smoking status significantly differed by sex ( p value < 0.05)>

Patterns of eating alone significantly differed by age group, education, income status, occupation, number of family members, household generation type, and marital status in men (all p values < 0.05).>

In men, no significant difference was found except for energy intake. Men who had breakfast alone reported higher energy intakes compared to those who reported never eating alone, lunch alone, dinner alone, or lunch and dinner alone (all p values < 0.05).>

Men which ate food by yourself otherwise dinner and you can dinner by yourself opposed that have those who ate with others got a significantly greater risk out-of MetS (modified chances percentages (AOR) 1.51, 95% rely on durations (CI) step one.06–dos.16; AOR step 1.54, 95% CI step one.05–dos.twenty-five, respectively). Women that got breakfast by yourself compared with individuals who consumed having anyone else got a notably lower threat of MetS (AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53–0.94). To own intestinal being obese, dudes who had meal and eating by yourself, breakfast and you can restaurants by yourself, otherwise breakfast, dinner, and you will dining alone all the got a substantially higher risk out of abdominal carrying excess fat (AOR dos.01, 95% CI step 1.27–step 3.20; AOR 1.50, 95% CI step 1.00–dos.25; AOR step 1.sixty, 95% CI step 1.01–dos.51, respectively) in contrast to people that ate with folks. Continue reading