The fresh new Authenticity Measure: Recognition inside the Russian Society

The correlational study is aimed at validating the Authenticity Scale in Russian culture. Authenticity is considered a trait responsible for a person’s ability to be oneself. It helps people resist environment pressure and prevent self-alienation, which contributes to maintaining psychological wellbeing. The original Authenticity Scale includes three subscales: Authentic Living, Accepting External Influence, and Self-Alienation. In total, 2,188 respondents (M_age = , SD_age = ; 78.1% female) participated in the survey. The dimensionality of the Authenticity Scale and its measurement invariance across sex, age, and depression rate subgroups was examined with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses; the original tripartite structure was kept. Convergent validity was tested through correlation analyses with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form, the Centre of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. According to the CFA results, the structure of the Russian version differs from the original one slightly (item 1 was moved from the subscale Authentic Living to the subscale Accepting External Influence and item 4 was excluded); however, the modified factor model showed the best absolute and comparative fit statistics [CFI = 0.961, TLI = 0.949, RMSEA = 0.050 (90% CI [0.40; 0.60]) and SRMR = 0.037]. The reliability (McDonald’s Omega) of the Authenticity Scale subscales was satisfactory and ranged from 0.78 to 0.84. It was revealed that youth are more likely to have high scores on Accepting External Influence and Self-Alienation than adults. Men and women did not significantly differ on the sub-scores of Authenticity Scale. Multigroup CFA also showed that Authenticity Scale scores may be biased in people with high levels of clinical depression, in terms of the item intercepts. Authentic Living is positively connected with mental wellbeing, self-esteem, positive affect, satisfaction with life, and negatively with depressive symptoms and negative affect; reverse trends were found for Accepting External Influence and Self-Alienation subscales. The Russian version of the Authenticity Scale is a valid, reliable tool that may be recommended for use in various areas of non-clinical practice.

Introduction

Individual authenticity the most necessary beliefs in the modern active and you may switching neighborhood in which anyone changes their personal, economic, and you will instructional standing and even identities from time to time during their lifestyle. Are genuine, becoming oneself – such purposes and you will wants are essential toward emotional welfare into the each other eudemonic and hedonic definitions (Kernis and Goldman, 2006; Smallenbroek et al., 2017; Sutton, 2020).

The fresh new Authenticity Level: Recognition for the Russian Society

Private authenticity contributes to some other helpful psychological phenomena, particularly self-confident affective relationships, subjective well-becoming, large notice-esteem, compassion and you can self-compassion, and you may psychological control (Sheldon et al., 1997; Neff and you will Suizzo, 2006; Theran, 2010; Boucher, 2011; English and you will John, 2013; Kifer et al., 2013; Wickham, 2013; Bochaver ainsi que al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Yanchenko and you will Nartova-Bochaver, 2020). Likewise, it is a boundary between worry and its own effects or a beneficial negative predictor away from emotional vulnerability (Goldman and Kernis, 2002; Satici et al., 2013). Ergo, it is a good which is really worth exploring, computing, and you can development.

In its extremely standard function, credibility can be defined as someone’s power to become real in order to by themselves, their characteristics, in addition to their lifetime trajectory. It looks are one of brud Spansk several “troubling” difficult rules, although not, as it can be found by themselves of people objective criteria and you may suggests a beneficial large coherence which have a particular individuals feelings or details that will be never direct (Jones, 2010). This particular aspect out of authenticity will make it hard to analysis the message authenticity of the associated gadgets, and you will, hence, extremely recognition scientific studies are restricted to the brand new investigating divergent validity merely. More over, skills credibility changes around the countries, and also for cross-social investigation, a stable and reputable software capturing the core posts from credibility will become necessary.